I address two topics here:
- Karen Hudes’ factual claims and evidence for resolution of our global debt system fraudulently pretending to be money, a choice of amnesty or arrests for those working for this system.
- Karen Hudes’ ridiculously lie-infused and unprofessional written responses to my work for full factual disclosure of .01% crimes and lies centering in war, money, and media. This includes multiple comments and tweets of Karen Hudes’ unsubstantiated claims that I’m a “Vatican agent,” a “shill,” that I should be subject for arrest, and her lies to play a victim upon receiving a legitimate concerning question.
I recommend that Karen’s factual claims be considered, her unprofessional behavior recognized, and never to wait for Ms. Hudes or anyone else to impede We the People’s demand for truth, justice, and good-faith solutions in the face of ongoing horrific .01% crimes centering in war, what we use for money, and lies. My personal conclusion from her ridiculously unprofessional and lying responses to me is to consider her testimony on other areas as unreliable.
After ~700 published articles, Karen Hudes either chose or was assigned to comment after I wrote this article about what I conclude is the central plan of the .01% at this endgame stage for the future for our planet:
I suggest that We the People should be curious why this particular article drew attention. You may wish to read it to answer that question for yourself.
The first comment she posted was repeated in an e-mail she sent me that challenged me for public communication. Karen e-mailed:
Why are you spreading this information without informing people of the Global Debt Facility containing the world’s wealth and international monetary gold reserves that is administered by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund Board of Governors? Or the Global Currency Reset that has been agreed? Are you trying to create confusion and chaos?… There is also an amnesty in effect to permit a transition. Your article is so unhelpful that without a public acknowledgement of our correspondence and your attempt to deal with some of the issues I have raised I am going to call you out as a Network of Global Corporate Control disinformation agent.
Within three hours of receiving her e-mail, I responded to request one paper/article documented to substantiate factual claims on her work, and documentation for her claim of what she said is “amnesty in effect to permit a transition.” However, just 70 minutes after I requested this documentation and certainly without time to respond on a Wednesday workday, she publicly responded to me:
…This tells me all I need to know about you. You are a Vatican agent.
To be clear, I assume Karen as a lawyer means the term, agent, as an accusation that I’m an employed minion; and that being a Vatican agent means that I serve the .01% criminal oligarchs that I clearly document my position to arrest within the article that Karen chose to comment upon. I had also immediately provided this paper to Karen as my best explanation to my claims, documentation, and analysis (conference paper for 1,600 people at an academic conference at the Claremont Colleges). Rather than consider what I professionally provide as factual claims and analysis, Karen escalated her rhetoric. To date, she has failed to uphold basic professional standards to understand a position before attacking it. If her claim of my being a “Vatican agent” is literal, she provides no evidence; if it is ad hominem, that is clearly unprofessional juvenile name-calling.
I responded to Karen’s work in good-faith comprehensively complete professional response with this article on the following day:
Karen ensued with comments you can read in the original article, along with my responses (among several interested readers).
1. Karen Hudes’ factual claims and evidence:
…authority as Acting General Counsel of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development or Legal Counsel to the Global Debt Facility, TVM-LSM-666…
The Global Debt Facility contains the world’s monetary gold reserves and is administered by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund Board of Governors. You have not dealt with this fact or that the US is going to surrender unilaterally if we don’t switch before the planned demolition of Federal Reserve Notes. You have also forgotten to deal with the fact that I happen to be the lawyer for the Global Debt Facility and the Acting General Counsel of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
… I am now something called the “overseer mandate trustee”. It was when I refused to sign over the Global Debt Facility to a group operating in Taiwan called YCT and succumb to a threat from a spook, that I found out I am one of the seven people authorized to go before the interbank screens to view the accounts of the Global Debt Facility https://s3.amazonaws.com/khude… and https://s3.amazonaws.com/khude… :
It is only when we use the Global Debt Facility to bankrupt the agents of the Network of Global Corporate Control that we can make any headway. But the fact is, unless we offer an amnesty program, we will not be able to access the Global Debt Facility.
I tried in multiple comments to clarify her position on money’s future, amnesty or arrests for .01% criminals, and how my articles are somehow unhelpful. On using gold for money in an e-mail, and her general tone:
We do not have mutual work. You are sowing discord, frightening people, and refusing to inform them of the ready solution that has a time limit, and which if missed will have dire consequences for them. If you insist on disseminating my work, please do me the courtesy of referencing the offices which I hold, and including my advice that we must transition from paper to currencies minted from the gold in the Global Debt Facility in a Global Currency Reset before the Federal Reserve Note crashes, bringing down the United States of America and the rest of the world with it.
Karen did not refute my final check of her position:
Ok, Karen, so I understand you correctly that your policy proposal is gold for currency, and that’s all. You do not support the creation of credit. You do not support the creation of debt-free money. These are preliminary policy positions that the 188 Ministers hold, and may be subject to variation upon their professional judgment. They’ll deal with other corruption as we move forward.
If I have misrepresented this, please let me know in the frame of your policy proposal for what is to be used for money.
Karen: I’ll take my understanding and your response as final unless you have correction to the above paragraph…
Karen had no correction.
2. Karen Hudes’ lies, unprofessionalism, and threats: a case study
As stated in the requisite history above, Karen asserted that I am a “Vatican agent;” either a factual claim without substantiation or a juvenile insult. She later repeatedly claimed that I am a shill. If we consider these claims as factual, both are that I’m a paid minion to .01% criminals. Neither claim has evidence. Therefore, both claims are lies. A statement of fact without evidence is a lie.
If we view Karen’s claims as a simple insult, then we establish an obvious unprofessional practice: refusing to address the message and focus on the messenger. As stated in the requisite history, as soon as Karen commented and e-mailed asking:
…public acknowledgement of our correspondence and your attempt to deal with some of the issues I have raised I am going to call you out as a Network of Global Corporate Control disinformation agent.
I immediately sent her my best single professional paper to explain and document my work for her clarity on the facts I assert. I asked for her best paper, and read it. I also looked further to best understand her work. Again, to date, Karen fails to state anything about actually doing her homework to read one paper to understand my work. For Karen to insult me without fairly representing my work is, of course, ridiculously unprofessional.
In fact, when professionals consider each other’s work, to insult someone without consideration of their work is a signal to remove that person from the discussion. Please imagine in your field of work if someone began insulting someone without knowing their work, and how professionals would respond to such lack of ethics.
Karen states I’m a candidate for arrest. With years of my professional documentation that US wars are not close to legal, and should be ended in arrests as the lawful tool to stop an obvious crime, Karen states in a comment:
Herman’s calls for arrests? Maybe he wants to be the first arrested.
Say what?!? For a lawyer to even hint another person is subject to arrest is serious business. Combined that I am a criminal suspect linked to my academic profession, according to Karen, borders on libel. Me:
And to be clear: you claim to work for this big-picture solution, and I conclude that it’s possible you’re telling the truth (I can’t refute your claims). You claim an amnesty program for those who cooperate that I’ve publicly advocated for since 2009, and my position is for We the People to demand arrests as the obvious lawful tool to stop ongoing crimes that for one example, kill a million children a month from preventable poverty (since 1995 this total exceeds all war deaths in all recorded Earth history). I also point-out that the IMF and World Bank’s capture by psychopaths are the principal agencies responsible for Crimes Against Humanity with intentional policy and clear understanding of causing these deaths. Those of us educated are comfortable with the paradox: yes, the top agencies of evil might just be the ones to most inspire internal revolt and cause game-changing justice
… Finally, Karen Hudes, I promise you forever that I will always represent you to others that you prefer arresting those calling for ending crimes that kill a million children every month, harm billions, and loot trillions in order to somehow trust the World Bank and IMF to change course. I understand, Karen, that we have splits within all our important institutions as this time of choosing Earth’s freedom or being minions to .01% psychopaths. I understand that our real history is closer to your version (or mine) than in any history textbook. What I don’t understand is your insistence to attack the most powerful allies working to reveal the .01%’s crimes, and to apply scholarship and policy experience to document pathways forward in good-faith effort. For the record, here is my best paper that documents my contribution, that Karen Hudes somehow concludes that I should be arrested for: http://www.washingtonsblog.com…
Here is my full response to Karen’s first claim that I’m a “Vatican agent”: http://www.washingtonsblog.com…
Ironically, Karen claims that “whistleblowers should be made whole” while employing the same tactics whereby whistleblowers are attacked. I notice this Karen, as do several other colleagues who’ve been in communication with me who are among Earth’s heroes to do exactly what you advocate: reveal these crimes and propose good-faith solutions.
Karen is an attorney and I’m an educator. Prosecuting attorneys often remove educators from jury panels because we tend to be more forgiving than others. Guilty as charged for my attempt to empathize with any human’s tremendous pressures living on Earth in 2015. Karen might be using a self-expression to really test people, she might be damaged in some way to so viciously attack others, she might herself suffer from disinformation (unintentional or intentional) and blackmail, I have no idea. I can be sure that she’s been harmed as all of us have, one way or another. This said, counselor Hudes, game on: you’ve attacked my work, accuse me of working with evil (I assume “Vatican agent” and “shill” mean my minionship to the psychopaths), and now fucking hint that I should be arrested??? Are you thinking Guantanamo on terrorist charges, solitary confinement, rendition for open torture?
Wow. All this from a person with strong academic background who won’t read the one paper I gave her that best summarizes my work. Ok, whatever, do what you want, and we notice. I’ll take the position at the present that Karen has a personality defect to lash-out; obviously without presenting factual substantiation for her outlandish claims of my agency for darkness and without any mention of my professional paper that best documents my position. We all have personality defects. If Karen is representing what is really happening behind the scenes, and she might be, I empathize with the pressures she faces. It might also be true that only someone with a bitchy personality would move forward with the courage Karen shows.
I like the work I see from you, Karen; that is far more important to me than your spurious accusations you make against me that as you as an attorney fully recognize as no more than name-calling.
Karen also lies to play a victim. A person commented that Karen purchased her $1.1 million home for $79,000 in 2010, which public records shows. I asked Karen:
Karen, we began this dialogue with your challenge for my public response to your questions, or you would call me out “as a Network of Global Corporate Control disinformation agent.” I gave you a detailed explanation in this article: http://www.washingtonsblog.com…
Ok: I have a concern with you. Your husband and you live in a $1.1 million dollar home that you apparently purchased in 2010 for just $79,000 with your husband, that is coincidentally just 2 miles across the Potomac River from CIA headquarters. My concern is that somehow you received a substantial gift. How did that happen? You said you decline bribes, and I know this interesting sale might have another explanation.
It was a refinance. I purchased that home just after my first daughter was born in 1989. Accuse me of accepting bribes?
Thank you, Karen; I found that you were the buyer and seller.
Karen lies in her follow-up:
In his latest comment, Carl Herman blamed a third bystander for his earlier accusation that I work for the CIA and am corrupt.
I gave Karen opportunity for self-correction on all the above:
I asked a question regarding a reader’s comment that you purchased a home valued at $1.1 million for $79,000 in 2010. You answered, and I verified that public records indicate that your husband and you were both buyer and seller. I thanked you for the clarification. How is that an “accusation of corruption?” Please either validate this claim by quoting me, or withdraw it.
I assume you wish to maintain your position after several opportunities that you will not respond to my public paper that best explains and documents my actual collection of factual assertions and analyses (link again provided below), and find my article directly addressing you (link also below) insufficient for you to either substantiate or withdraw your claims that I have agency with evil (“Vatican agent” and “shill”); active employment as a minion.
I’ll further assume that you’re comfortable hinting for my arrest, even from your position that such “hints” often preclude .01% assassinations, employment terminations, and other significant damages.
Carl Herman tries to prevent me from all attempts to withdraw from this conversation, which is generating much more heat than light, with further obfuscations. I can see I am just going to have to hold my nose and ignore his further affronts, no matter how outrageous, to get out of this quagmire.
These accumulated lies on my professional academic work, an attorney stating that I’m subject to arrest, and then inverting facts to accuse me of making a damning statement border on criminal assault.
An obvious question: if my case study reveals how Karen rolls, how reliable is her broader testimony on the largest and most important monetary issues?
My conclusion: Interested readers can invest the time to read all the comments among Karen, interested readers, and me.
A related fact: I’ve worked with literal thousands of outstanding human beings working to wrestle fact from spin, and enact policies for good-faith upgrades for humanity. The universal human response when we encountered serious and competent partners for factual understanding of complex issues was/is gratitude. Isn’t it true for you, the reader, that when you meet someone serious in an area of interest that your response is appreciation?
Conversely, those of us educated recognize the response of disinformation agents to do exactly how Karen began her commentary:
Are you trying to create confusion and chaos?
Then, to resort to fear and herd the sheeple into .01% policy. Karen:
Permanent gold backwardation MEANS THAT WE ARE GOING TO ALL STARVE AND ALL TRADE WILL CEASE if Vatican Agents like you manage to confound everyone before we take care of the Global Currency Reset….You are a Vatican agent because you are trying to confuse people when we have limited time to get the job done. You are a Vatican agent because you are working with other Vatican agents like Ellen Brown, all busy in the monetary field where the Network of Global Corporate Control likes to try and maintain its control.
Again, please appreciate that Karen’s response is without any response to my professional work offered her. She argues from ignorance and a straw man representation of my work. In addition, this insistence that without her one solution based on one factor of one commodity within a rigged-casino market would result in all of us starving and all trading ending is an epitome of .01% fear-mongering.
Make your own conclusion. My full conclusion is here, with this article’s amendments that Karen’s lies, unprofessionalism, and stating that I’m somehow a candidate for arrest while playing the victim has me no longer trust anything she says.
Although I bet Karen takes the polar opposite response, these are my terms to forgive her:
- Either present evidence I’m a “Vatican agent” and “shill,” or withdraw the claim with an apology.
- Apologize for extensive criticism of my work while ignoring the one paper I provided best documenting my work.
- Either present evidence I’ve committed a crime subject for arrest, or withdraw your statement suggesting I’m subject for arrest with apology.
- Either present my text that I somehow accused you of working for the CIA and are corrupt, or withdraw your statement with apology.
Again, my immediate response of what the public should do is expressed best in just 90 seconds: former US Marine Ken O’Keefe powerfully states the “very obvious solutions” to US/UK/Israel unlawful Wars of Aggression to arrest the obvious criminal leaders (video starts at 20:51, then finishes this episode of Cross Talk):
Note: I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History, with all economics factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences. I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.
Carl Herman is a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History; also credentialed in Mathematics. He worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu
Note: Examiner.com has blocked public access to my articles on their site (and from other whistleblowers), so some links in my previous work are blocked. If you’d like to search for those articles other sites may have republished, use words from the article title within the blocked link. Or, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive. I’ll update as “hobby time” allows; including my earliest work from 2009 to 2011 (blocked author pages: here, here).