AIR DEFENSE RESPONSE
September 11, 2001
Gary Evans www.ringnebula.com
Now that over five years have passed since September 11, 2001, a growing number of US citizens question the published, official story of that day1 finding the official evidence to be inconsistent and lacking credibility.
Armed with evidence gathered by hundreds of grass roots citizen organizations and individuals, a growing number have come to the conclusion that members of the Bush Administration colluded with 9/11 planners and attackers, and that the resulting catastrophe was used to frighten us into a war we would otherwise have refused.
The world has yet to untangle the complexities of that day. Many questions remain involving the unprecedented failures of the World Trade Buildings, failures of the intelligence community to head off the attacks in the first place, and finally the spectacular failure of the military to defend U.S. airspace, despite the investment of billions in detection equipment, aircraft, highly trained pilots, and the like.
This paper focuses on this last question; specifically: What enabled four hijacked jumbo-aircraft to continue unimpeded flights without interception long after being identified as flights in major trouble, until three crashed into selected targets and one, into the ground? Was all of this the result of a terrible set of coincidences and incompetencies, or was 9/11 the result of purposeful actions taken by a few well placed jackals within this government?
________________________________________________
The official story of 9/11 is an inconsistent fiction. The document that reports the story — the official, government sponsored 9/11 Commission Report — concludes that incompetence and errors were to blame. A careful review of the evidence now at hand leads to other conclusions: the 9/11 attacks were carried out with precision, and required support — whether known, or unknown to the actual attackers — from agents within the Bush government. The official report concludes that the catastrophic failure of airspace defense on 9/11 was, in so many words, the result of a series of personnel failures within the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Department of Defense (DoD); all these people are officially exposed as a gaggle of incompetent dufusses. Is the official document an elaborate lie? Please read on and decide for yourself.
AIRSPACE [SCRAMBLE] PROTOCOLS OF 9/11
The Department of Defense (DoD) protocol defining appropriate actions to be taken in the event of airspace emergencies and hijacked airplanes was rewritten after many years of successful application just three months before 9/11/01 - on June 1, under the direction of former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.
Painstaking reviews of that protocol document (CJCSI 3610.10A)2 and of its predecessor (CJCSI 3610.10)3 have revealed no meaningful changes other than its relocation under the Joint Chiefs of Staff organizational flow chart. There are sentence rewrites, altered paragraph contents, etc., but careful flow charting of each protocol leads to identical sets of expected behaviors.
As will be explained below, despite the fact that the relocated protocol is functionally identical to the earlier version, the rewrite nonetheless played a significant role in the events of 9/11. As you digest this information, keep in mind that the FAA officially cataloged 67 North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) airspace scramble/intercepts between September 2000 and June 2001,4 yet between June 1, 2001, and September 10, 2001, there were none.5a Following 9/11, the number of scramble/intercept events again became quite common.4
Each protocol – old (CJCSI 3610.103) and new (CJCSI 3610.10A2) – defined two action tracks: 1) EMERGENT –
immediate action required, or 2) NON-EMERGENT – a slower process appropriate to a typical hijacking, where demands are issued and negotiations are expected to proceed.2,3
The emergent track empowers air traffic controllers to communicate immediately and directly with the military to request assistance as needed, with no further authorization required.
The slower (hijack) track was designed to allow sufficient time to notify and synchronize the highest reaches of government as processes would unfold. In those cases, a contact chain of command was clearly defined, beginning with the FAA, then continuing across to the DoD chain of command — headed by the Secretary of Defense — whose authorization was finally required for any military assistance given.
If the relocated protocols are functionally identical, why were they rewritten three months before 9/11? And, how is it that the number of fighter-interceptor scramble orders dropped to zero for those three months5a, after having been so common during the months and years preceding the rewrite? Robin Hordon 5b, 5c, an experienced past FAA Air Traffic Controller, who in former years helped write airspace protocols for the government, offers a cogent explanation: when newly (re)written protocols are released, a series of briefings are given to those who will be responsible to act on them. Briefings are personal, given on a one-to-one or small “need-to-know” group basis and can contain subtle biases regarding how those in upper levels expect the protocols to be implemented.
There is no log or paper trail of the biased briefings. All that remains is the numerical evidence: scramble orders between June 1, 2001 and September 10, 2001 dropped to zero.
Summarizing: the newly rewritten — but functionally unchanged — protocol offered an opportunity to re-brief people thereby creating a functional stand-down mechanism with no paper trail remaining.
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFFING: CHAIN OF COMMAND ON 9/11
There were several key FAA and military personnel changes in place on 9/11 which, in concert with the slow-mode Airspace Defense Protocol, resulted in a finely tuned response timeline set to trail events as they occurred. It is that fine tuning that enabled the devastation of 9/11.
The following discussion will focus on the slow (hijack) mode chain of command and personnel who filled each of the positions on 9/11. The command chain is summarized here:
Read the conclusion of this report at http://www.ringnebula.com/Oil/911/air_defense_911.pdf
37 Responses to “FAA and DOD Cleared Way for 9/11 Hijackers”
290886 580322Sweet internet internet site , super style and style , rattling clean and utilize genial . 555014
I simply want to say I am new to blogs and definitely enjoyed your web site. Most likely I’m want to bookmark your site . You definitely have superb writings. Bless you for sharing with us your web page.
this site is cool!! http://tokumei10.blogspot.jp/ thx read
If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.
Aw, this was a really nice post. Taking a few minutes and actual effort to produce a very good article… but what can I say… I put things off a lot and don’t seem to get anything done.
Good blog post. I definitely appreciate this site. Keep it up!
596912 701144of course like your web-site nevertheless you require to check the spelling on quite a couple of of your posts. Numerous them are rife with spelling issues and I to discover it extremely bothersome to inform the reality nevertheless I
people’s viewpoints on whether or not its secure plus a excellent thought to become a blogger to get cash. many thanks!.
When I initially commented I appear to have clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and from now on every time a comment is added I get four emails with the exact same comment. There has to be an easy method you are able to remove me from that service? Appreciate it!
Exactly what I was searching for, thankyou for putting up. “Pardon one offense, and you encourage the commission of many.” by Publilius Syrus.
this site is coooooooooooooooooooooool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! http://tokumei10.blogspot.jp/ thx read
273100 379725Flexibility indicates your space ought to get incremented with the improve in number of weblog users. 911935
Its like you read my mind! You appear to understand much about this, as if you wrote the e book on it as well. I really believe which you could apply some to force your message home a little bit, however other than that, this can be wonderful blog. An incredible read. I am going to definitely revisit.
Hiya! Quick question that’s totally off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly?
My weblog looks weird when browsing from my iphone.
I’m trying to find a template or plugin that might be
able to resolve this problem. If you have any recommendations, please share.
Cheers!
it is possible to place some aloe vera gel on soon after, it’s soothing and will not clog pores
Digg
While checking out DIGG yesterday I found this
When you finally make it and it cools, do you reheat it to work with? Like a minute? Thanks!
I truly got into this post. I found it to be interesting and loaded with exclusive points of interest. I like to read material that makes me feel. Thank you for writing this excellent content material.
This same myself , it was the other way around the worst class financial products operations will be richer . Made up of the beating of thought
The landscape present within a card shows us the atmosphere. Scorpio This can be a very pleased and inspiring time for you. Did you discover it an inspiration, and perhaps even a little little bit frightening?
Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.
Hello in support of a brilliant interpret I am experiencing deliver with the rss though? Don’t know why Incapable to subscribe to it. Is near a person getting identical rss problem? Anyone who knows kindly answer. Ta
Yahoo results
While searching Yahoo I found this page in the results and I didn’t think it fit
funny painful fails
[…]Here are a number of the websites we advocate for our visitors[…]
Yahoo results
While browsing Yahoo I discovered this page in the results and I didn’t think it fit
Tumblr article
I saw someone writing about this on Tumblr and it linked to
Digg
While checking out DIGG yesterday I found this
Dreary Day
It was a dreary day here today, so I just took to piddeling around on the internet and realized
News info
I was reading the news and I saw this really cool topic
Yahoo results
While browsing Yahoo I discovered this page in the results and I didn’t think it fit
Dreary Day
It was a dreary day here yesterday, so I just took to piddeling around on the internet and found
Wikia
Wika linked to this place
Yahoo results
While searching Yahoo I found this page in the results and I didn’t think it fit
Informative and precise
Its difficult to find informative and precise info but here I noted
Informative and precise
Its hard to find informative and precise info but here I found
Informative and precise
Its difficult to find informative and precise information but here I found
biggest trucks in the world
[…]just beneath, are several completely not related web-sites to ours, nevertheless, they may be surely really worth going over[…]