“There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice …”– U.S. vs. Jannottie, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982).Collusion of DOJ and Judicial Branch
In November, for the election of both members of Congress and the President keep these things in mind:
1. Justice Scalia just turned 78.
2. Justice Kennedy will turn 78 later this year.
3. Justice Breyer will be 76 in August.
4. Justice Ginsburg turned 81 about a week ago. In addition, Justice Ginsburg has Pancreatic Cancer.
5. Justice Stephens has already said he would retire and is just waiting for Obama to be reelected.
Thus the next Congress and president could appoint as many as 5 new Justices over the next 2 to six tears years, or over the next 8 years if a new President gets a second term.
This election is about much more than about jobs, ObamaCare, Tax etc.
Whomever we elect as membrs of Congress and as President in November is almost certainly going to choose at least one new member of the Supreme Court, in addition to hundreds of other life-tenured federal judges, all of whom will be making momentous decisions about our lives and the rights of citizens vis-a-vis the growth of government for decades to come.
If you don’t think your being a concern citizen and vote THINK AGAIN.
So for anybody who is thinking of not voting because your favorite didn’t get nominated, or writing in a candidate who can’t win, imagine this: Supreme Court Chief Justice, Eric Holder.Violation of Void Ab Initio Limitation of Government Empoyees
After you have stopped gasping, kindly send this to other concerned citizens.
Civil Rights Advocate
I was born and grew up in the South Bronx, New York City. After Viet Nam, I was a System Engineer with UNIVAC/Sperry, while working for my BA from Boise State University and my JD from the University of Colorado Boulder, Flemmings School of Law. Based on being a civil rights activist, after graduation I received appointments in both the Carter and Reagan Administrations (in the latter I was SES Director of the Office of Civil Rights for the USDA). I am fluent in Spanish and business fluent in French.
After my two White Housse appointments, and serving as Acting Legal Counsel to the Office of Personnel, Washington, D.C., in 1983 I accepted the position of Contracts Administrator/Assistant General Counsel with Morrison Knudsen International on their $2 Billion Cerrejon Port/Mine Project in the Republic of Colombia.
In 1987 as a member of the Virginia State Bar, the Supreme Court of Virginia, the U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 11th, DC, and Fed. Circuits, U.S. District Ct. for the E.D. of VA, and the U.S. Tax Court, I established in Barranquilla, Colombia a multinational law practice to provide legal service to both nonresident U.S. and Colombian citizens in the United States.
The success and unique of my law practice was confirmed: first, when he was retained as Legal Representative of SSA LP/Armada Co’s Board of Directors (“SSA LP et al.”), to manage contract litigation on a claim to Treasure Troves against the Government of the Republic of Colombia (“GOC”), described by Congressmen Benjamin A. Gilman, Dan Burton, and Phil M. Crane, as the "largest private claim by American citizens against a foreign state pending in the world;” second, when the Clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court stated when I prevailed in Martinez v. Lamagno and DEA, 515 U.S. 417 (1995)(confirming the right to an evidentiary hearing of the U. S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) “scope of authority” certification), it was “the only instance in recent memory that a lawyer with an address outside the United States has argued a case before the Court.” Tony Mauro, Legal Times, “Testing the Limits of Sovereign Immunity” (1995); third, when the court of Colombia held in my contract suit, that SSA LP et al., had a contract right to 50% of the value of the Treasure Troves; and, fourth, when I published newsletters and litigated cases on the civil rights of nonresident U.S./Colombian citizens under the U.S. Constitution and federal statutes vis-a-vis illegal DOJ’s policies under the stewardship of then Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder, i.e. Lopez v. First Union, 129 F3.rd. 1186 (11th Cir. 1997)(successfully stopped DOJ’s unlawful searches of U.S. bank records based only on being Hispanic); Organization JD Ltda. v. Assist U.S. Attorney Arthur P. Hui and DOJ, 2nd Cir. No. 93-6019 and 96-6145 (holding that DOJ’s U.S. Attorney can be sued for violation of Electronic Communication Privacy Act); and, Cooperative Multiactive de Empeados de Distribuidores de Drogas “Coopservir Ltda.” v. Newcomb, et al., D.C. Cir. No 99-5190, S Ct. No 99-1893 (District Judge directing DOJ to consider argument of violation by issuance of prohibitive bill of attainder).
Since 2008 to the present I have been in litigation against the conflicting financial interest of Beltway Lobbyists/Attorneys with my choate statutory lien on the Treasure Trove, the cronyism with HOLDER and JOHN G. ROBERTS, as well as other Beltway Lobbyist/Attorneys, and animosity toward me for filing suits against government employees,including judge, for violation of nonresident U.S./Colombian citizens rights. The evidence confirms an ongoing business conspiracy, constitutional tort, and interstate racketeering enterprise of government attorneys and judges acting outside the scope of employment, authority, jurisdiction, and not in the interest of the United States to systematically deny me access to an impartial court by obstruction of justice and misprision of the felony of treason by the use of unconstitutional court rules Part Six § IV of the S.Ct. VA issued in violation of Art. VI §§ 1, 5 and 7 of the VA Const., to reciprocally enforce void ab initio orders in violation of the Internal Revenue Code, Social Security Act, ant the Rules Enabling Act.
