Cuomo Takes on The Money Party

Bank of America Looks Like  First of Many

treasuryjob1 Cuomo Takes on The Money Party

Michael Collins

“This merger (Bank of America and Merrill Lynch) is a classic example of how the actions of our nation’s largest financial institutions led to the near-collapse of our financial system,” said Attorney General Cuomo. “Bank of America, through its top management, engaged in a concerted effort to deceive shareholders and American taxpayers at large. This was an arrogant scheme hatched by the bank’s top executives who believed they could play by their own set of rules. In the end, they committed an enormous fraud and American taxpayers ended up paying billions for Bank of America’s misdeeds.” (Image)

New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo

Andrew Cuomo’s complaint filed in the New York Supreme Court, County of New York against the Bank of America and two former top executives has the potential to push that too big to fail entity off the edge of a very steep cliff. The charges of massive fraud are based on a compelling and exhaustive filing on February 4.

A trial will likely involve testimony by the current Bank of America CEO and President Brian Moynihan against defendants Kenneth Lewis, the bank’s former CEO and board chairman, former chief financial officer (CFO) Joseph L. Price, and the bank itself. Price is currently in charge of BofA’s credit card division.

The complaint charges fraud before, during and after the bank’s merger with struggling brokerage firm Merrill Lynch in late 2008. The fraud cost bank shareholders and citizens billions of dollars. This is the first major case brought against our nation’s largest financial institutions. These are the same financial institutions and executives that nearly destroyed the economy.

lewistitle 1 Cuomo Takes on The Money Party

Cuomo’s press release states clearly that Lewis and the bank  are examples of a much larger problem. It appears to be a leading indicator of future actions by the New York attorney general. Why else would Cuomo have generalized about institutions (plural) in his statement about this particular case?

If Cuomo succeeds in taking down one of the toughest guys on the block, he’ll make a point to the rest of the crew: you’re next, get ready to cooperate. Many of the key perpetrators are located in Cuomo’s jurisdiction, although Bank of America (BofA) is headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. Clearly, there are others in line for some New York style law and order.

Cuomo is joined in this action by Niel Barofsky, Special Inspector General for the federal government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). TARP provides the billions in bailouts to bogus bankers and corporations. There’s a credit line of $23.7 trillion should it be needed for even more bailouts. Ever wonder why you can’t get a loan? They’ve taken all the money.

Charges and remedies

The bank and the two named executives are charged with failing to inform the bank’s board of directors and shareholders of the major red ink on Merrill Lynch’s books prior to the merger. CEO Lewis, CFO Price, and other BofA officers and professionals chose to hide $16 billion of Merrill Lynch known pre tax losses prior to board approval. That’s fraud, plain and simple.  Complaint filed by New York Attorney General, Feb 4, 2009

The complaint also charges that the same parties with strong arming the federal government for $20 billion to cover Merrill’s debt by threatening to back out of the merger if the money wasn’t forthcoming. Then Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke had encouraged BofA to acquire Merrill, apparently without a rider that BofA would get billions in the process to cover their fraudulent business practices.

The lawsuit seeks two overriding remedies. The two named defendants and the entire Bank of America are enjoined from “any conduct, conspiracy, contract, or agreement, and from adopting or following any practice, plan, program, scheme, artifice or device similar to, or having a purpose and effect similar to, the conduct complained of above.”

In addition, the defendants and the bank are to “disgorge all gains, pay all penalties and pay all restitution and damages caused, directly or indirectly, by the fraudulent and deceptive acts complained of herein”

These and the other remedies promise a degree of justice and, quite frankly retribution for the mess caused by the defendants.  An unnamed and unintended remedy could be serious damage to the good will value of the Bank of America.  The spectacle of a conviction of the bank and a former CEO and current division head  for fraud would have a devastating effect on public confidence.  Too big to fail may be a notion upended once and for all by a guilty verdict.

Witness Lineup – It’s Bank of America versus Bank of America

Andrew Caffrey and Todd Wallach of the Boston  Globe, hinted that Bank of America president and CEO, Brian T. Moynihan will be a key witness for the prosecution. The Globe article notes that the current BofA chief, “who was involved in negotiations (for the Merrill acquisition) as the bank’s general counsel, was not charged.” Later in the same article, they quote Cuomo as saying, Moynihan, “has been candid with our office with respect to the roles he played after becoming general counsel.”

BofAmoynihantes Cuomo Takes on The Money Party

Put simply, Moynihan was central to the merger, knew about the fraud, participated in it, but didn’t blow the whistle. All of that is established in Cuomo’s complaint. He cooperated with Cuomo and wasn’t indicted. His name will be at the top of the attorney general’s witness list, no doubt.

As if that’s not bad enough for the bank, defendant Joseph L. Price, former CFO, is currently heading up Bank of America’s credit card division.

Should Moynihan testify, we’ll see BofA’s current CEO helping Cuomo convict his predecessor of fraud. Moynihan’s testimony will also argue for a conviction of his current head of credit card operations. Since Bank of America is charged, we’ll also see its current CEO plus the “Relevant Parties” described in the complaint testifying that the corporation was also guilty of fraud. Many of the 35 Relevant Parties named are current or former BofA executives or board members.

Other key witnesses may include Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Barnanke and former Treasury Secretary and TARP architect Henry Paulson, They encouraged the Bank of America – Merrill Lynch merger as part of their efforts to prevent an alleged financial meltdown at the end of the Bush administration..

Charlie Gasparino of the Daily Beast reports that the defense counsel, former U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White, wants the case dismissed. If not, Gasparino says that “one person close to the defense” claims that White will call Paulson and Bernanke to testify. Cuomo has the facts and  obviously believes Paulson and Bernanke on the sequence of events leading to these charges. Absent a “Perry Mason” moment by the defense, their testimony holds no surprises or benefits for the defendants. Mary Jo White has little or nothing at this point other than bluster.

Justice for the people?

It’s been ten years since Congress and President Clinton freed Wall Street and the major banks to open a big casino on Wall Street.  That resulted in ruinous schemes like the real estate bubble. It’s been five years since Alan Greenspan told citizens to get an adjustable rate mortgage, cash out the equity in their homes, and jump into the stock market. It’s been over a year since Wall Street and the big banks nearly ruined the economy, cost citizens jobs, savings, retirements, and countless other hard earned gains through a variety of no-win schemes sold as solid investments.

Nothing of any importance has been done to regulate the financial industry since the bailouts. Prior to the Cuomo-Barofsky charges, there have been no major cases brought against the perpetrators of our current troubles.

Hopefully, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo started what will become an era of accountability for those at the very  top. This should be about more than just one case. It’s an example of top down accountability.

May the bank, Mr. Lewis, and Mr. Price have the speediest of trials and the absolute maximum penalties should they be found guilty.

They knew exactly what they were doing every step of the way.

END

This article may be reproduced in full or part with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.

Next Monday – Cuomo’s Lock Down – The Case in Detail

Complaint filed by New York Attorney General, Feb 4, 2009

Rep. Kucinich Grills Ken Lewis on Fed Emails, June 11, 2009

Rep. Cummings Questions Brian Moynihan Regarding the BofA/Merrill Lynch Merger, Nov 17, 2009

pf button both Cuomo Takes on The Money Party
share save 171 16 Cuomo Takes on The Money Party
  • http://www.phishtrackers.com Edyth Emick

    I hate the phishing emails they appear to get more desperate by the day I recieve two or three on a daily basis and submit them to phishtrackers a site I stumbled upon that allows you to submit them anonymously.

  • lionel

    M. Roland M. TAIEB Date : Monday, April 26
    Marketing manager
    22 Zalman Shazar St., Ramat Poleg
    Netanya
    Israel
    Tel : 972-9-8850635
    Fax : 972-9-8850685
    Cell : 972-522-516153
    e-mail : goulette@netvision.net.il

    REGISTERED LETTER – RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

    Re : Formal notice sent by FedEx

    To the CEO of BankBoston

    Dear Sir,

    Fifteen years of inquiries and international investigations have elicited various answers and results, tending through all channels to indicate yourself as point of origin.

    We recapitulate for you:

    On October 22, 1997, you signed a contract between Biosite Inc. and BankBoston and its partners. This was a ten-year contract expiring on October 22, 2007, with a stolen patent suddenly and inexplicably presented to Biosite so that BankBoston received the grand honor of distributing, through Biosite, an extremely significant patented innovation stolen from Nogdan of Israel. The contract concerns a patented innovation of great import, unique in the world, which can isolate any protein at all from the genome a million times better, in terms of quantity, than any other of the world’s most modern technologies, and thus can produce human antibodies in a very short time, amounting to an hour or two instead of the 6 to 14 months required by the hybridoma method. The latter, invented by the founder of Biosite himself, Howard Greene, provides very expensive and unstable human antibodies, vulnerable to protein cross-reactions that consign the whole effort to the trash bin, but in the entire world there had been no other method.

    This new, revolutionary patent, unique in the world, using blood and not inside the cell like the molecular technique, is US Patent no. 5,869,409, applied for in August 1993 and issued February 9, 1999. It happens that for this patent, with Ms. Rivka Zusman as inventor, all marketing and development rights were already assigned by Rivka Zusman on February 15, 1994, to Nogdan Immunochemicals Ltd. of Gilo, Jerusalem, consisting of four partners: the Zusman couple holding 50% and I, Roland Taieb, together with my wife Sarah Shoval, the other 50%. By this contract, complete global exclusivity in marketing belongs to Mr. Roland Taieb, i.e. to myself, with validity even confirmed, as of May 29, 2000, by the Supreme Court of Israel (whose irreversible decision I attach for you) as well as by a further legal decision, of November 19, 1998, which is very harsh and severe regarding any company dealing with the patented Nogdan innovation without the prior written consent of Mr. Roland Taieb.

    Starting in September 1995, the Zusmans, together with their attorney Yair Green, met with Howard Greene of Biosite, a small company of no great value, traded on the Second Marché and selling an apparatus for detecting the level of swallowed or injected drugs. Nothing more! It happens that the Abbott company, of the USA, filed a complaint against Biosite for stealing the patent, on the grounds that the patent belongs to Abbott and was stolen from them by Biosite. Biosite paid $5.5 million in order to continue operations rather than close its doors. This is on record throughout Biosite. However, Biosite, the co-inventor of the hybridoma method, immediately licensed to others, for two years as of September 22, 1995, the patent stolen from Nogdan. Because the first results were so unique globally, Biosite had itself registered on NASDAQ as of February 12, 1997, and it was very well received on the market.

    At the same time, since 1996, years of clinical trials were under way for Medarex Inc. and its transgenic mice. The trials all succeeded, as the mice provided human antibodies at a level of 100%, whereas Medarex had previously never exceeded 85% and thus had achieved nothing of value for medicines, vaccines, etc. On December 1, 1999, Biosite and Medarex quietly filed for a patent under which, using the extraordinary capabilities of the patent stolen from Nogdan, the mice would provide human antibodies at a level of 100% and thus change the face of the new medicine. The announcement was made worldwide through the media on December 6, 1999, and immediately Medarex exploded upward on NASDAQ by 3500% — absolutely unique in NASDAQ history! But Medarex was thoroughly concealing its Biosite connection and the stolen patent. It did not announce its collaboration with Biosite until June 1, 2000 (or two days after the Israeli Supreme Court’s decision!), which was six months after the successful murine experiments, so that the gigantic commercial success of Medarex and Abgenix would not have the stolen Nogdan patent as its one and only progenitor.

    Medarex immediately lined up Abgenix (and subsequently Pfizer) to create a duopoly rather than retain a monopoly forbidden by American law, and it collected $39.7 million for being one of the world’s only two exploiters of a unique, but stolen, patent.

    Then suddenly on October 22, 1997, BankBoston and its partners signed a ten-year contract with Biosite so that Biosite, with no explanation whatever, suddenly became the licensee of the patent stolen from Nogdan. Immediately on learning this, Johnson & Johnson acquired Biosite. We are demanding 3 thousand million dollars per year in indemnification from Biosite for their use of the stolen patent. The sum for the fourteen years between 1996 and 2010 is 42 thousand million dollars, but that is what they bought into. (A copy of their letter is attached.)

    Moreover, more than 1200 laboratories around the world are using the stolen Nogdan patent and prospering enormously. All these companies have been warned via FedEx at least twice.

    As of the start of August 2010, entire teams of attorneys will be doing everything possible to recover damages, with interest, from every company, and never less than 50% of their 2007 turnover.

    More significant yet : In December 2004, Biosite notified us, in a registered letter — absolute proof — from the Biosite director-general of intellectual property, that they were the owners of prior art for this patent and that they were prepared to have the patent, which they had stolen from Nogdan, annulled! (His harsh but absurd letter is attached.) Admitting, beyond a possible doubt, that they were working with the stolen patent, they claim that it is theirs by virtue of prior art beginning in 1995. Our patent was filed for in August 1993, rendering their case hopeless.

    For BankBoston, matters are more serious a thousandfold, because you and your partners are the largest American banks and it is neither admissible nor excusable that someone has cheated and misled you. Following are my two prescriptions, according to which I may or may not reduce my extremely firm demand for damages and interest amounting to $75 thousand million.

    1) Explain, if you can, how such a patent, belonging to Nogdan, would be in your possession since 1997, when the patent was assigned its number only on February 9, 1999, so that in 1997 it was still held secret in the vaults of the US Patent Office.

    2) Please provide me a list of the companies that signed for the patent with you, and a copy of the contracts.

    In addition:

    3) What is the exact role of Wellington and of Kopp? What about their millions of blocked shares? What are they doing, and on what authority?

    4) If you refuse to cooperate, I promise I will have everything in your banks, and all your property, confiscated against the debt to us.

    5) If you show good will, then the sum will be reduced in accordance with your good will because at least proof will exist that for your own part, you were also cheated.

    I repeat that only ten days are allotted to you. We have lost too much of our time and money — from 1995 to 2010 is fifteen years — and we refuse to pointlessly lose more.

    I await your prompt reply.

    Roland TAIEB
    22 Zalman Shazar St., Ramat Poleg, tel : 972-9-8850635, fax : 972-9-8850685, cell : 972-522-516153

  • http://www.purelypennystocks.com Kathrine Arebalo

    Just had to take the two seconds to post a thank you. Read through through your webpage and really liked the articles, bookmarked and I plan on returning soon!

  • http://cheapecovers.net/ Mark Franklin

    Wow! That’s some really awesome blog you have! By the way, great post! Good luck! ;)

BREAKING NEWS


Order The New Project Censored Book Here

Enter your email address below for Daily Censored updates:

Log in -