Comments on: “Conspiracy or cock up?” White House reaction to ersatz bomber

By: Why the New Security Zone along the Canadian Border? | Phantom Report

Why the New Security Zone along the Canadian Border? | Phantom Report — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:05:29 +0000

[...] and security experts acted like a scanner would have somehow prevented events that had nothing to do with any type of security [...]

By: Why the New Security Zone along the Canadian Border? | Scoop News « Ye Olde Soapbox

Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:58:46 +0000

[...] and security experts acted like a scanner would have somehow prevented events that had nothing to do with any type of security [...]

By: Why the New Security Zone along the Canadian Border? | COTO Report

Why the New Security Zone along the Canadian Border? | COTO Report — Mon, 03 Oct 2011 06:11:21 +0000

[...] and security experts acted like a scanner would have somehow prevented events that had nothing to do with any type of security [...]

By: Crazyclickbankcash

Crazyclickbankcash — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:44:01 +0000

You made some respectable factors there. I seemed on the web for the difficulty and located most people will go along with with your website.

By: Nicolle Benn

Nicolle Benn — Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:10:22 +0000

Worked out & went rock climbing today. Out w/ Aussies tonight. Surfing & I’m driving the Great Ocean Road tomorrow. 1 word: Perfection

By: Dr. Graeme MacQueen – “Challenge to the Peace Movement” « Awake yet?

Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:06:47 +0000

[...] bombing incident on December 25 and the repeated media reports blaming al Qaeda in Yemen. (See also “Conspiracy or Cock Up?” White House Reaction to Ersatz Bomber by Michael [...]

By: Reindeer Games « American Commentary Blog

Reindeer Games « American Commentary Blog — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:29:02 +0000

[...] takes and comments on the political theatre playing out before our eyes in a piece titled, “Conspiracy or cock up?” White House reaction to ersatz bomber. Let’s see how it played out and the back and forth that occured on MSNBC’s Countdown [...]

By: Andrew

Andrew — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:05:43 +0000

I think this piece of information is worth exploring in the context of this “failed attack”. Coincidentally, the same firm or its subsidiaries were responsible for airport surveillance on 9/11 and at the London underground during the attacks in 2005.

Israeli firm blasted for letting would-be plane bomber slip through
Haaretz http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1141434.html

Israeli Firm Responsible for Amsterdam Airport Security Where Terrorist Boarded Aircraft
http://theyeshivaworld.com/news/General+News/43868/Israeli+Firm+Responsible+for+Amsterdam+Airport+Security+Where+Terrorist+Boarded+Aircraft.html

Israeli Security Firm Fails To Stop Passenger From Carrying Explosives On Detroit Flight
Philadelphia Bulletin http://www.thebulletin.us/articles/2010/01/04/news/nation/doc4b42303eaa5ea507916080.txt

By: T.J., Washington, DC

T.J., Washington, DC — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 09:25:34 +0000

Yes, Michael, Big Zbig may be the opposite of ‘nappy-headed’ (except in the British sense of ‘nappy’). However, Obama is Zbig’s boy.

Zbig was a moving force in 1979 overthrow of Shah of Iran & in insertion of Khomeini & Muslim Brotherhood in Iran. UK, US, USSR & most G7+ also participated in installation of current Muslim Brotherhood regime in Iran. Their agenda was & is oil price escalation, geo-political control & geo-economic control of Mid-East & global power. Zbig & G8+ oligarchs are succeeding. Obama now helps Zbig & directly works with G8+ oligarchs. Obama’s whack-a-mole shots across the bow of CIA & US intel fit with this agenda by helping to create & maintain a bunker mentality within US intel.

Additional conflict & chaos with & in Iran has not (yet) been necessary to achieve the G8+ oligarchical agenda of continued global control. However,
if the oligarchs need additional cover for their rape of the global economy, Bibi & Israel may rescue the oligarchs by defending Israel against Iran’s truly-impending nuclear weapons. Israelis do not want to do this but may soon feel forced to do so in prophylactic self defense. We may soon see.

To preclude Israel’s alleged ‘need’ to strike Iran, WE may want to support Persians in creating ‘A New Iran.’ 75%+ of Persians (Muslims & non-Muslims) prefer a new form of government in Iran. Less than US$100 Million would fully fund Iranian regime change by & for the Persian people. G8+ oligarchs prefer the status quo with Iran (for now). Ask GW Bush, Zbig & Obama. Or watch what they did & do — not what they said & say.

* * *

Postscript: To ensure that friends, family & fathers of potential terrorists do NOT talk to U.S. authorities, did you notice how CIA & official US sources publicized the Detroit-headed diaper bomber’s father’s warnings (ex post facto)? Anonymity might be essential in ensuring that others with such info will come forward & talk with U.S. authorities. Did the Detroit diaper bomber’s father get such anonymity? Not! The diaper bomber’s father’s life may now be in jeopardy in Nigeria (another oil exporting nation).
* * *

By: Michael Collins

Michael Collins — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:17:35 +0000

If ever so brief, the shadow government was put on notice on January 4. Without commenting on ultimate motives, the White House pointed fingers at elements in the government with their own "agenda." I tried to recall another time when this happened and couldn't. If I'd tried a little longer, I'd have connected this article which I wrote in February 2007 as the drums were beating for an Iranian invasion. Zbgniew Brzezinski testified before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. The story was covered very well by World Socialist Web, Barry Grey who questioned Brzezinski after he testified, AP (which pulled their story), and me, a couple of days later. Here's what Zbig said. The pdf link is to the submitted testimony, which is brief and remarkable.

If the United States continues to be bogged down in a protracted bloody involvement in Iraq, the final destination on this downhill track is likely to be a head-on conflict with Iran and with much of the world of Islam at large. A plausible scenario for a military collision with Iran involves Iraqi failure to meet the benchmarks; followed by accusations of Iranian responsibility for the failure; then by some provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the U.S. blamed on Iran; culminating in a "defensive" U.S. military action against Iran that plunges a lonely America into a spreading and deepening quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.. (.pdf of Brzezinski’s testimony)

That's quite a throw down by Brzezinski. When I asked a mentor of sorts if he thought Zbig was not anti-war, he said, Brzezinski wants to make sure that no one other than himself starts the war.